Hummingbirds are a familiar sight in many parts of the world, known for their diminutive size and amazing hovering flight abilities. Their small size and high metabolisms require them to consume up to twice their body weight in nectar each day, forming an integral link between plants and pollinators. This has led some ecologists to propose that hummingbirds serve as “keystone” species in their environments. But what exactly does it mean for a species to be a keystone, and is this designation truly applicable to hummingbirds?
What is a Keystone Species?
The concept of a keystone species was introduced by zoologist Robert Paine in 1966. Paine studied starfish in the intertidal region of Makah Bay in Washington state. When he removed the starfish from experimental plots, the biodiversity and composition of species changed dramatically compared to control plots where starfish were left alone. The starfish acted as keystone predators, exerting an influence on the entire ecological community far beyond what would be expected from their biomass alone. As Paine described it, they were the central stone that held an ecological arch in place.
So in general terms, a keystone species is one that has a disproportionately large influence on its environment and community relative to its abundance. Keystone species affect communities through a variety of mechanisms, such as predation, grazing, or pollination. Their removal initiates shifts in overall species composition and diversity. Keystones help structure and maintain the function of entire ecosystems.
Characteristics of Keystone Species
While the exact parameters that define a keystone remain debated, researchers have identified a number of traits and impacts commonly associated with them:
- They exert strong direct and indirect effects on community structure.
- Their impact is large relative to their biomass or abundance.
- Their removal causes drastic cascading changes in ecosystem composition and diversity.
- They provide critical resources and create habitat heterogeneity.
- It is difficult to replace their functional role via redundancy.
Keystone species may be predators, prey, plants, or pollinators. Their identities depend on the local environmental context. Not all species classified ecologically as “dominant” or “important” necessarily qualify as keystone. True keystone status requires experimental evidence that removing the species shifts biological communities to alternative states.
Examples of Established Keystone Species
While the concept remains controversial, researchers have identified a number of species that fulfill keystone roles in their native habitats:
- Sea otters – Their predation on sea urchins influences kelp abundance.
- Prairie dogs – Their burrows provide habitat for other species.
- Beavers – Their dams alter stream flow, increasing biodiversity.
- Starfish – Their predation controls mussel and barnacle populations.
- Sea stars – Their grazing limits algal overgrowth on coral reefs.
- Elephants – Their grazing and browsing maintains African savanna vegetation.
These examples highlight how different keystone mechanisms, from predation to habitat modification, help structure ecological communities.
Are Hummingbirds Keystones?
Now we can directly address the initial question – do hummingbirds act as keystone species? There are several important considerations:
Pollination Services
Hummingbirds are the primary pollinators for a number of plant species, especially tubular flowers adapted to the hummingbird’s long, slender bill and hover-feeding. Researchers have demonstrated substantial pollination declines and reductions in plant reproduction when hummingbirds are excluded from these flowers. This pollination service qualifies as a potentially keystone interaction.
Influence on Plant Communities
By dispersing pollen between flowering plants, hummingbirds influence gene flow and reproductive success. This could indirectly affect aspects of plant community structure like species abundances and diversity. However, their precise role in maintaining plant community composition remains understudied.
Nectar Robbing
Hummingbirds also engage in “nectar robbing” by piercing holes in flowers to access nectar without pollinating them. This cheating behavior can reduce plant reproduction, demonstrating that hummingbirds are not uniformly beneficial pollinators. The balance of mutualism vs antagonism likely depends on ecological context.
Abundance and Biomass
Hummingbirds have relatively low abundances and biomass compared to other avian pollinators like insects and bats. Even specialist bird-pollinated plants also receive visits from other pollinator types. This makes their functional redundancy and replaceability unclear.
Interaction Strength
Only a small fraction of plants rely exclusively on hummingbird pollination. Many species adapted to bird pollination are also visited by insects. This diffusion of interaction strength across pollinator types may limit hummingbirds’ keystone status.
Experimental Evidence
Direct experiments that remove hummingbirds and quantify ecosystem changes are rare, making their hypothesized keystone status hard to confirm.
Trait | Keystone Status? |
---|---|
Pollination services | Potentially |
Influence on plant communities | Unresolved |
Abundance and biomass | Unlikely |
Interaction strength | Unlikely |
Experimental evidence | Lacking |
Conclusion
Based on these considerations, the evidence for hummingbirds as keystone species remains equivocal:
- They provide important pollination services for some plants.
- Their influence on community dynamics is poorly quantified.
- Their overall interaction strength appears limited.
- Rigorous exclusion experiments are rare.
While hummingbirds may serve as “functional keystones” by providing important pollination roles, they likely do not meet the criteria to be considered true ecological keystones on par with sea otters or starfish. Their small size, abundance, and functional redundancy distinguish them from classic keystone species examples. More experimental removals of hummingbirds are needed to definitively test their hypothesized keystone status across different habitats. For now, the verdict remains open on whether hummingbirds are obligate keystone species or simply beneficial pollination contributors. Their ecosystem functions likely fall along a continuum between strong keystone effects and minor facultative interactions depending on the ecological context.
Why Keystone Status Matters
Debates over hummingbirds’ keystone significance may seem like ecological hair-splitting. But identifying true keystone species has important implications for conservation:
- It helps predict cascade effects from species loss.
- It identifies fragile interactions requiring protection.
- It clarifies which species play disproportionately critical roles.
- It guides management priorities and interventions.
- It improves understanding of interaction networks.
Clarifying hummingbirds’ functional influence on communities will shed light on their conservation importance relative to other pollinators. Even if they do not meet strict keystone criteria across all settings, their contributions to pollination, plant reproduction, and ecosystem stability make them important subjects for continued research and protection efforts.
Determining keystone status remains an ongoing ecological challenge. Species’ influences can be context-dependent and their removal often has complex nonlinear effects. But identifying species exerting strong community control can provide fundamental insights into the forces structuring nature’s intricate web of life. Keystone concepts thus remain both vitally important and satisfactionally unresolved in ecology – a dynamic nexus of theory, field experiments, and conservation application.
References
Abrahamczyk, S., & Kessler, M. (2010). Hummingbird diversity, food niche characters, and assemblage composition along a latitudinal precipitation gradient in the Bolivian lowlands. Journal of Ornithology, 151(3), 615-625.
Dalsgaard, B., Trøjelsgaard, K., Martín González, A. M., Nogués-Bravo, D., Ollerton, J., Petanidou, T., … & Olesen, J. M. (2013). Historical climate-change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks. Ecography, 36(12), 1331-1340.
Dublin, H. T. (1995). Vegetation dynamics in the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem: the role of elephants, fire, and other factors. Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem, 71-90.
Estes, J. A., & Palmisano, J. F. (1974). Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science, 185(4156), 1058-1060.
Gende, S. M., & Quinn, T. P. (2004). The relative importance of prey density and social dominance in determining energy intake by bears feeding on Pacific salmon. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82(1), 75-85.
Kearns, C. A., Inouye, D. W., & Waser, N. M. (1998). Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 29(1), 83-112.
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M., & Price, M. V. (2004). Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1557), 2605-2611.
Paine, R. T. (1966). Food web complexity and species diversity. The American Naturalist, 100(910), 65-75.
Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., Menge, B. A., Bond, W. J., Mills, L. S., … & Paine, R. T. (1996). Challenges in the quest for keystones: identifying keystone species is difficult—but essential to understanding how loss of species will affect ecosystems. BioScience, 46(8), 609-620.
Sazatornil, F. D., Moré, M., Benitez-Vieyra, S., Cocucci, A. A., Kitching, I. J., Schlumpberger, B. O., … & Amorim, F. W. (2016). Beyond neutral and forbidden links: morphological matches and the assembly of mutualistic hawkmoth–plant networks. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85(6), 1586-1594.
Wright, J. P., Jones, C. G., & Flecker, A. S. (2002). An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia, 132(1), 96-101.